<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-157062" src="https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/misunderstood-works-of-art.jpg" alt="misunderstood works of art" width="1200" height="690" srcset="https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/misunderstood-works-of-art.jpg 1200w, https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/misunderstood-works-of-art-300x173.jpg 300w, https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/misunderstood-works-of-art-1024x589.jpg 1024w, https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/misunderstood-works-of-art-768x442.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" />
&nbsp;
Some famous paintings are not what they seem at first glance. Some symbols and forms transform over the years, leaving viewers unable to decode the true intentions of artists, even if it is a well-known and revered one. For example, for almost two centuries, art historians debated the gender identity of one of Caravaggio’s characters. Read on to learn more about famous works of art misinterpreted by their audiences.
&nbsp;
<h2>1. Rembrandt’s “Night Watch”: The Famously Misinterpreted Masterpiece</h2>
<figure id="attachment_119125" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-119125" style="width: 1200px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-119125 size-full" src="https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/rembrandt-used-arsenic-paint-night-watch.jpg" alt="rembrandt-used-arsenic-paint-night-watch" width="1200" height="690" srcset="https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/rembrandt-used-arsenic-paint-night-watch.jpg 1200w, https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/rembrandt-used-arsenic-paint-night-watch-300x173.jpg 300w, https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/rembrandt-used-arsenic-paint-night-watch-1024x589.jpg 1024w, https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/rembrandt-used-arsenic-paint-night-watch-768x442.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-119125" class="wp-caption-text">The Night Watch by Rembrandt van Rijn, 1642. Source: Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam</figcaption></figure>
&nbsp;
Rembrandt’s Night Watch is one of the most famous paintings in the world and a prime example of Rembrandt’s mastery as a painter of group portraits. Commissioned in 1639 by a unit of Amsterdam civic guards, the painting was long believed to represent a scene of their nighttime duty. However, as it turned out rather recently, Rembrandt never intended to paint the guards at night.
&nbsp;
Over the years, the painting accumulated dust and dirt. Moreover, the thick layer of varnish applied by both Rembrandt and those who retouched the work later began darkening over time, making the work dimmer and yellowish. In fact, in 1911, the varnish saved the painting from destruction after an unemployed shoemaker attacked it with a knife to express his anger at being unable to find a job in Amsterdam. The varnish layer was so thick that the knife only scratched it, leaving no further damage to the painting.
&nbsp;
During World War II, the Night Watch was removed from the Rijksmuseum, rolled up, and hidden in a cave vault. After the war, conservators launched a major restoration project on it. Upon clearing the layers of varnish, they suddenly discovered that the scene painted by Rembrandt actually unfolded during the day, with shadows roughly corresponding to 2 PM. Still, the popular painting title remained unchanged, preserving the history of the work.
&nbsp;
<h2>2. Caravaggio’s “The Lute Player”</h2>
<figure id="attachment_157063" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-157063" style="width: 1200px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-157063" src="https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/caravaggio-lute-painting.jpg" alt="caravaggio lute painting" width="1200" height="886" srcset="https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/caravaggio-lute-painting.jpg 1200w, https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/caravaggio-lute-painting-300x222.jpg 300w, https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/caravaggio-lute-painting-1024x756.jpg 1024w, https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/caravaggio-lute-painting-768x567.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-157063" class="wp-caption-text">The Lute Player, by Caravaggio, 1595-96. Source: Hermitage Museum, St Petersburg</figcaption></figure>
&nbsp;
The Lute Player by <a href="https://www.thecollector.com/baroque-obsession-caravaggio/">Caravaggio</a> is one of the best-known masterpieces from the artist’s early period. It exists in three versions, with the most recent of them unveiled only in 2001. The versions have several differences in details and objects used in the composition, but overall depict the same scene. The Lute Player is also the earliest known example of Caravaggio using his signature contrast of light and shadow. What is curious is that for two centuries, the young man in the painting was believed to be a woman.
&nbsp;
The gender confusion happened in the 18th century, when several Caravaggio researchers saw the portrait as a representation of a young woman. The androgynous look of the figure, as well as the unavailability of paintings for long-term study (all three versions were kept in private collections until recently), provoked endless speculation that lasted until the 1970s.
&nbsp;
Then, art historians reached a general conclusion, basing their final decision on two important arguments. First, in the vast oeuvre of Caravaggio, there are no similar images of women. Specifically, in that period of his life, he painted only young men in similar settings and compositions. Even more convincing evidence is the music the young person is playing. Next to the figure, there is a book with sheet music. The piece that the boy is playing is a French-language madrigal (a secular lyrical song) written for a male voice.
&nbsp;
<h2>3. Mark Rothko’s “No. 5/ No. 22”</h2>
<figure id="attachment_157065" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-157065" style="width: 1095px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-157065" src="https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/rothko-522-painting.jpg" alt="rothko 522 painting" width="1095" height="1200" srcset="https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/rothko-522-painting.jpg 1095w, https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/rothko-522-painting-274x300.jpg 274w, https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/rothko-522-painting-934x1024.jpg 934w, https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/rothko-522-painting-768x842.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1095px) 100vw, 1095px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-157065" class="wp-caption-text">No. 5/ No. 22, by Mark Rothko, 1950. Source: MoMA, New York</figcaption></figure>
&nbsp;
This particular composition by <a href="https://www.thecollector.com/late-rothko-transcendent-2/">Mark Rothko</a> is widely misinterpreted due to popular expectations of color. Upon seeing the oranges and the yellows, wider audiences often assume the happiness and joyfulness of the scene. However, Rothko himself called it a violent and tragic work. Indeed, the contrast of color, as well as the scratches, atypical for Rothko, that damage the layer of red paint, convey a sense of uneasiness, if not panic. It is an outburst of destructive energy that is contained within the canvas’s boundaries.
&nbsp;
Mark Rothko himself was aware that his paintings often get misinterpreted, as most view them simply as exercises in color combination. In fact, he was focused on conveying strong emotions and concepts through color only, using no form or symbols. Some art historians interpreted the scratches on No. 5/ No. 22 as a schematic representation of the crucified Jesus’ arms. However, Rothko himself almost never titled his paintings with anything but numbers, as he refused to make interpretation easier for the viewer. Instead, they had to address the depth of emotion and feeling within themselves to grasp the true meaning of Rothko’s work.
&nbsp;
<h2>4. Jan van Eyck’s “Arnolfini Portrait”</h2>
<figure id="attachment_129508" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-129508" style="width: 877px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-129508" src="https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/jan-van-eyck-arnolfini-portrait-painting.jpg" alt="jan van eyck arnolfini portrait painting" width="877" height="1200" srcset="https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/jan-van-eyck-arnolfini-portrait-painting.jpg 877w, https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/jan-van-eyck-arnolfini-portrait-painting-219x300.jpg 219w, https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/jan-van-eyck-arnolfini-portrait-painting-748x1024.jpg 748w, https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/jan-van-eyck-arnolfini-portrait-painting-768x1051.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 877px) 100vw, 877px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-129508" class="wp-caption-text">The Arnolfini Portrait, by Jan van Eyck, 1434. Source: The National Gallery of Art</figcaption></figure>
&nbsp;
Jan van Eyck’s portrait of the <a href="https://www.thecollector.com/arnolfini-portrait-theories-analysis/">Arnolfini family</a> is one of the most famous yet mysterious works of art in art history. It is the earliest known double portrait in Western art and a composition that astonishes with its complexity and puzzles with the long list of scholarly debates around it. For a while, it was discussed in the context of the notorious Hockney-Falco thesis proposed by Pop artist David Hockney. Hockney claimed that van Eyck was unable to paint space in such a complex and accurate way without using optical devices. However, proper research by Renaissance experts has proved that van Eyck indeed painted his work relying on his own artistic skill and expertise.
&nbsp;
The most frequently shared fallacy concerning the Arnolfini Portrait is the supposed pregnancy of a young woman, presumably a newlywed. Indeed, the cut of her dress and the shape of the bodice suggest a silhouette abnormal for present-day fashion. In the late Gothic period, a protruding stomach was regarded as the ultimate symbol of femininity, as it referred to the supposed main purpose of a woman in her life. Motherhood was considered the ultimate virtue, and thus painters changed the body proportions of their models, and dressmakers added extra layers of fabric to bodices and skirts.
&nbsp;
<h2>5. Edvard Munch’s “Scream” </h2>
<figure id="attachment_16442" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-16442" style="width: 800px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-16442" src="https://wp.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/image2-14.jpg" alt="The Scream, 1893 oil on canvas" width="800" height="994" srcset="https://wp.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/image2-14.jpg 800w, https://wp.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/image2-14-241x300.jpg 241w, https://wp.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/image2-14-768x954.jpg 768w, https://wp.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/image2-14-561x697.jpg 561w, https://wp.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/image2-14-364x452.jpg 364w, https://wp.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/image2-14-728x905.jpg 728w, https://wp.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/image2-14-608x755.jpg 608w, https://wp.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/image2-14-758x942.jpg 758w, https://wp.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/image2-14-313x389.jpg 313w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-16442" class="wp-caption-text">The Scream, by Edvard Munch, 1893</figcaption></figure>
&nbsp;
Munch’s Scream found its way into popular culture, which turned it into an iconic painting that is often distorted or misinterpreted due to its wide circulation. Contrary to popular belief, the figure itself is not screaming. Instead, it is trying to block the insufferable, blood-curdling scream that is filling the air around it. The Scream originated from <a href="https://www.thecollector.com/paintings-by-edvard-munch/">Munch’s</a> own experience. According to his diaries, once, he was walking near a fjord at dawn and was startled by the sky that suddenly turned red. It was then that he sensed a shrieking “scream passing through nature” that shook him. Some psychiatrists believed it was the experience we now know as a panic attack.
&nbsp;
Some art historians think that the scream described by Munch had a more tangible explanation than a mental breakdown triggered by the impression of nature. According to them, the location where Munch was promenading was known for two main facilities: the biggest slaughterhouse in Oslo and a mental asylum where Munch’s sister was treated at the time.
&nbsp;
<h2>6. Raphael’s “Young Woman With Unicorn”</h2>
<figure id="attachment_16995" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-16995" style="width: 800px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-16995" src="https://wp.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/image7-8.jpg" alt="Portrait of a Young Woman with a Unicorn by Raphael, 1506" width="800" height="994" srcset="https://wp.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/image7-8.jpg 800w, https://wp.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/image7-8-241x300.jpg 241w, https://wp.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/image7-8-768x954.jpg 768w, https://wp.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/image7-8-561x697.jpg 561w, https://wp.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/image7-8-364x452.jpg 364w, https://wp.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/image7-8-728x905.jpg 728w, https://wp.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/image7-8-608x755.jpg 608w, https://wp.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/image7-8-758x942.jpg 758w, https://wp.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/image7-8-313x389.jpg 313w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-16995" class="wp-caption-text">Portrait of a Young Woman with a Unicorn, by Raphael, 1506</figcaption></figure>
&nbsp;
The famous painting by Raphael has complex origins and a puzzling history of reception. Supposedly painted by <a href="https://www.thecollector.com/get-to-know-raphael-the-prince-of-painters/">Raphael</a> under the impression of Leonardo da Vinci’s Mona Lisa, for years it was categorized as an image of Saint Catherine of Alexandria. The saint was recognized by her typical attributes of martyrdom—a wheel and a palm frond. However, during the 1934 restoration, art historians discovered that beneath the image of a wheel, there was a painting of a small unicorn, a Medieval symbol of chastity. This meant that someone over the long course of the painting’s history had overpainted the image, turning an unknown noblewoman into a saint.
&nbsp;
This, however, was not the only transformation of Raphael’s Lady. Beneath the unicorn, researchers found a painting of a small dog, symbolizing fidelity. The silhouette of the dog became the basis for the unicorn figure, with its long ears transforming into the folds of the lady’s dress. Further analysis has shown that in its first version, the woman did not have anything in her arms at all and was noticeably older.
&nbsp;
<h2>7. Ivan Kramskoi’s “Portrait of an Unknown Woman”</h2>
<figure id="attachment_157064" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-157064" style="width: 1200px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-157064" src="https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/kramskoi-woman-painting.jpg" alt="kramskoi woman painting" width="1200" height="904" srcset="https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/kramskoi-woman-painting.jpg 1200w, https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/kramskoi-woman-painting-300x226.jpg 300w, https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/kramskoi-woman-painting-1024x771.jpg 1024w, https://cdn.thecollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/kramskoi-woman-painting-768x579.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-157064" class="wp-caption-text">Portrait of an Unknown Woman, by Ivan Kramskoi, 1883. Source: Wikipedia</figcaption></figure>
&nbsp;
The Portrait of an Unknown Woman has become a classic work of Realist painting, frequently appearing on book covers for legendary works of Russian literature. Over the years, it developed a reputation for conveying mysterious beauty, alluring and arrogant at the same time. In Kramskoy’s time, however, it provoked a scandal.
&nbsp;
The unknown woman is dressed in the latest fashion of her day, parading her black velvet and fur hat adorned with <a href="https://www.thecollector.com/victorian-great-feather-craze-ecological-impact/">feathers</a>, thin leather gloves, gold bracelets, and blue ribbons. Her outfit is outrageously expensive and brand new, and that in itself gives us a clue about her true identity. At the time, the nobility considered the obsessive following of the latest trends as vulgar and inappropriate. Another hint is the open top of her carriage and a vacant seat next to her. She is seen riding through Moscow openly and alone, openly and arrogantly observing others. Similarly to Manet’s <a href="https://www.thecollector.com/what-was-shocking-about-manets-olympia/">Olympia</a>, she is not a confident noblewoman but a courtesan who challenges the rules of the society around her.

These misunderstood works of art—from Rothko to Caravaggio—challenge perceptions, revealing hidden meanings and emotional depths long overlooked by generations of art lovers.

7 Misunderstood Masterpieces and the Surprising Truth Behind Them

The story of the Phoenix has classical versions and pagan counterparts. But what are its origins, and how did Christian poets shape its symbolism?

The Origins & Symbolism of the Phoenix (From Ancient Greece to Christianity)

In Greek mythology, the Primordial gods personified fundamental elements and natural forces, shaping the cosmos and paving the way for the Titans and Olympians.

The Primordial Gods of Greek Mythology Who Preceded the Olympians

Was Homer’s Iliad written in the Dark Ages or in the Archaic Era? Is it even possible to determine the age of the story of the Trojan War?

When Was Homer’s Iliad Written? Unraveling the Controversy

The Great Commission is a term that is often used by followers of Christianity today, yet very few stop to consider what it is really all about. 

What Is the Great Commission? The Final Words of Jesus

King John has gone down as one of the worst kings in English history. Does he deserve his reputation?

Was “Bad” King John Really That Bad?

The Aztec Empire existed between 1325 and 1521 and used a mix of military might and diplomatic deliberations to expand.

How Did the Aztec Empire Rise and Fall in Mesoamerica?

Gustave Moreau was the defiant visionary whose mystical paintings shaped a groundbreaking new movement in France and beyond.

How Gustave Moreau’s Mystical Paintings Defined the Symbolist Movement

You Searched: rembrandt