Magnus Wijkander
@magnus-wijkander

Magnus WijkanderSweden

Member since Jun 11, 2024

About Magnus Wijkander

Magnus is an independent researcher with an MSc from Radboud University, Nijmegen in Cognitive Neuroscience with a minor in Neurophilosophy. Their interests lie in the philosophy of science, metascience, and the workings of the brain.

Education

MSc Cognitive Neuroscience with Minor in Neurophilosophy

Radboud University, 2022

BA Cognitive Science

Gothenburg University, 2020

Areas of Expertise

NeurophilosophyPhilosophy of ScienceModern Philosophy
Illustration of a silhouette head containing stairs inside.

Does Science Actually Describe Reality? Putnam vs. Van Fraassen

Putnam argued science's success would be a miracle if its theories weren't true. Van Fraassen argued theories only need to work, not be true.

Read article
Close-up of a microscope with laboratory gloved hands.

Why Nancy Cartwright Says Science Has No Fundamental Laws

Nancy Cartwright argues science has no fundamental or universal laws, only local truths held together by nomological machines built for specific contexts.

Read article
Photograph of Ian Hacking photoshopped into an Edward Hopper painting.

The Intriguing Work of the Philosopher Who Was Called the “Canadian Foucault”

Ian Hacking, the so-called Canadian Foucault, tackled problems in the philosophy of science through particular cases. He was a philosopher of showing, not telling.

Read article
Robot hand holding a human brain

Who Actually Owns Your Thoughts in the Age of Neuroscience?

Explore the encroaching ethical crisis of brain colonization and the struggle to protect the last bastion of human privacy.

Read article
Conceptual illustration of processing complex information into clarity

How Neuroscience Is Shaking the Foundation of Our Legal System

Can brain scans predict criminal intent? We examine the tense collision between modern neuroscience and the age-old foundations of our justice system.

Read article
woman in green walking through grey crowd

Why Is the Explanatory Gap the Unsolvable Problem of Neuroscience?

The Explanatory Gap is the challenge of reconciling subjective mental experience with the objective physical processes studied by neuroscience.

Read article
cephalopod swimming in deep blue water

What If Cephalopods Are the Closest Thing to Alien Intelligence?

What if the most profound encounter with a truly alien intelligence isn’t light-years away, but lurking beneath the waves of our oceans and seas?

Read article
why choose idealism mind dependent reality

Why Choose Idealism? The Case for a Mind-Dependent Reality

Idealism is the view that reality is fundamentally mental and is taken to contrast physicalism directly. What is the argument for idealism?

Read article
metaphors brain science

Metaphors in Brain Science Can Be Misleading and Here’s Why

Metaphors in brain science shape our understanding. While offering valuable insights, they can also mislead. As science progresses, new metaphors emerge, reflecting our evolving knowledge.

Read article
naturalism assumptions modern science

What Is Naturalism? (Definition & Criticism)

Naturalism is the metaphysical assumption that makes modern science possible. Is naturalism justified and viable?

Read article
what are arguments against physicalism

What Are the Arguments Against Physicalism?

Thanks to physics, physicalism has been a strong metaphysical position, but over time, confidence in it has slowly been eroded.

Read article
are we prediction machines predictive processing

Are We Prediction Machines? Predictive Processing & Brain Science

Predictive processing unifies brain function, treating action and perception as two sides of the same coin and possibly extending beyond.

Read article